5 Comments
User's avatar
Daniel Adamowicz's avatar

Thank you for this piece! Looking forward to part 3, God willing! God bless from Germany!

Expand full comment
Princeps's avatar

Thank you for another insightful post.

Expand full comment
X.P. Malaprade's avatar

Protestantism does not rest so chiefly upon Luther as you say, nor were his calls for reformation a mere rebellion against his teachers; nor is Sola Scriptura identical to Nuda Scriptura, though you do rightfully critique the latter. Sola Scriptura is merely taking the Scriptures alone to be the final, infallible rule of faith; it follows thus that, in order to interpret it correctly, one needs to acknowledge and understand the context in which its component books are written. While this is generally preserved well across historic traditions, there are also cases where developments get out of hand due to excess influence from external traditions—especially after several centuries of such developments unimpeded by persecution or rivalry with other religions. This is something the Reformation Fathers sought to course-correct upon, even if there were some who jumped on that bandwagon (especially later on) to twist the Scriptures into something other than they truly are like the Gnostics of old.

Expand full comment
John's avatar

Thoroughly enjoy reading this, thank you so much for putting in the effort to write it so eloquently.

Expand full comment